(Apologies for the audio quality. I was outdoors and didn't have the right equipment)
Another day, another misleading claim about climate change. It’s exhausting to counter every misleading statement from officials, but ignoring them risks allowing misinformation to spread unchecked. In an interview on Fox on February 19th, 2025, the new US energy secretary Chris Wright said,
" A warmer planet with more CO2 is better for growing plants. The world has been getting greener for decades—[there’s] 14 percent more greenery around the planet today than there was 40 years ago. And we have far more people die of the cold than die of the heat."
These claims have multiple inaccuracies and they also oversimplify the realities of climate change. Let’s break it down.
1. More CO₂ ≠ Better Agriculture
Sure, CO₂ can make plants grow faster — in the lab under ideal conditions. I. In the real world, things get messy:
Higher CO₂ levels reduce the protein and mineral content of staple crops like wheat and rice, worsening global malnutrition. [1].
Warming climates are shifting agricultural zones, making 10% of current croplands unusable by 2050 - —by 2100, 30% gone. (Hope you like cactus salad!) (IPCC projections)[2]
The CO₂ “fertilization effect” weakens over time, as plants adapt and other growth constraints (like water scarcity) take hold. [3]
And let’s not forget: heat, drought, and floods often erase any short-term benefits.[4]
Ask any farmer—climate change isn’t helping their crops.
2. The “Earth is Greener” Argument is Misleading
Yes, satellites show more greenery since the 1980s. But here’s what they don’t show:
Most of this greening is from CO₂—but it disproportionately benefits weeds and invasive species, not food crops. [6]
Carbon storage isn’t permanent. While more plant growth absorbs CO₂ initially, warming accelerates organic matter decomposition in many regions, therefore carbon loss offsets the gains. [7]
Biodiversity loss is a bigger problem. More monocultures (think endless soybean fields) mean fewer natural and diverse ecosystems, hurting pollinators and wildlife.
3. Cold vs. Heat Deaths: A False Comparison
It’s true that historically, more people have died from cold than heat. But context matters:
Most cold-related deaths happen in mild temperatures (above freezing), often due to socioeconomic factors (e.g. poor housing and poverty)
Heatwaves, though less frequent, cause sharper mortality spikes during extreme events and as the planet warms, heat-related deaths are set to surpass cold deaths by 2040 in many regions.[8] Tropical regions already see heat deaths exceeding cold deaths [9]
The real crisis? Inequality. Wealthier countries adapt. Poorer ones suffer. By 2100, 30% of the world’s population will face deadly heat annually. What’s consistent across the research is that changes in heat mortality reveal deep inequalities between those driving climate change and those suffering most from the consequences. Climate change isn’t just a temperature debate—it’s a justice issue. [10]
4. Oversimplified Trade-offs
Climate change doesn’t come with convenient trade-offs. The risks are stacking up:
Food supply: Crop failures in multiple “breadbasket” regions (like the U.S. Midwest and China) will become four times more likely at 2°C warming, threatening global supply chains.
Water scarcity: Each 1°C rise reduces freshwater availability for 7% of the global population
Rising disease risks: Warmer climates boost pests and foodborne illnesses (hello, Salmonella).
This isn’t just about "hot vs. cold." It’s about interconnected systems—our food, water, biodiversity, health, and at the end of the day, survival.
So, to conclude. Oversimplified arguments make climate change sound like a debate about wearing a jacket vs. shorts. It downplays the real risks. Science tells a different story. And if you hear another misleading claim, don’t panic. Just remember: Reality always wins.
This article is free to read, but if you found it useful, please consider subscribing or making a small donation at my Buy Me A Coffee page below. The Climate Historian is an independent publication, entirely supported by readers like you.
Message The Climate Historian
Notes:
[1] Nutritional challenges of staple crops due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels: Case of Sub-Saharan Africa - ScienceDirect , Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition | Nature
[2] https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/chapter/chapter-5/
[3] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-36130346
[4] Improvement of heat stress tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L), by using conventional and molecular tools - PMC
[5] Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth
[6] https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/goddard/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth-study-finds/
[7] Effects of Rising Atmospheric Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide on Plants | Learn Science at Scitable
[8] Comparative Assessment of the Effects of Climate Change on Heat- and Cold-Related Mortality in the United Kingdom and Australia | Environmental Health Perspectives | Vol. 122, No. 12
[9] Comparative Assessment of the Effects of Climate Change on Heat- and Cold-Related Mortality in the United Kingdom and Australia | Environmental Health Perspectives | Vol. 122, No. 12
[10] How many people die from extreme temperatures, and how this could change in the future: Part two - Our World in Data
Music: Sweaty Linen - Surf Ninja 3 (YouTube Audio Library)
Share this post